In february 2009, oceanside high school graduate denise finkel sued facebook, four former classmates, and their parents for false and defamatory statements made against her. Defamation is considered to be a civil wrong or a tort. There are many demands to make defamation only as a civil wrong. In some legal sys tems, the term defamation is broken down into libel and slander. Defamation and freedom of speech oxford scholarship. More defamation cases arising out of social media can be anticipated. Right to freedom of expression it has already been shown that the right to freedom of expression is not absolute, but qualified. A person that has suffered a defamatory statement may sue the person that made the statement under defamation law, which would be called a defamation case. Defamation free download as powerpoint presentation. The political leaders are filing defamation cases against each other on frivolous grounds and then cross defamation cases are being filed. The illegitimacy of the use of defamation laws is to maintain public order or to protect public interests feinberg, 1990.
Attempting to find a balance between freedom of speech and the prohibitions against defamation and insult, french law determines that publication of a true statement that concerns a persons private life may nonetheless be defamatory for the purpose of criminal liability. Freedom of speech and the law of defamation stupel and berman. One of the most important case of reynolds v times newspapers 3 explains freedom of expression in terms of the public interest in receiving and imparting information in the. Exceptions to the first amendment congressional research service 3 own home.
Freedom of speech and the law of defamation view larger image for many whose homes are where their hearts are, the draft expropriation bill, 2019, which seeks the right to freedom of expression is a right enshrined in section 16 of the constitution. The law has fashioned the civil action of defamation as a means of drawing the balancing line between the freedom to speak and the freedom to associate. Defamation law walks a fine line between the right to freedom of speech and the right of a person to avoid defamation. Topic 4 freedom of speech defamation freedom of speech. Topic 4 freedom of speech free download as powerpoint presentation. It shows how defamation law has been used in some countries to suppress speech and limit access to. Freedom of expression, media law and defamation media legal. Pdf freedom of expression, autonomy, and defamation. Principles on freedom of expression and protection of reputation. The injury can also be to a persons trade or business. Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom, one of the cornerstones of democracy in europe, enshrined in various key texts, including the european convention on human rights. Its my freedom of expression to say what i want and to have my own opinion.
The phenomenon, also known as libel tourism, is caused by a mixture of national and eu rules of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments, even though. The anti defamation league has been fighting antisemitism, racism and bigotry since 19. Free speech and civil defamation the centre for internet. In this matter, the south gauteng high court was called upon to determine a claim of defamation arising out of this comment. Defamation laws necessarily represent an interference with the right to freedom of expression. Freedom press, 1998 107 6 defamation law and free speech the law of defamation is supposed to protect peoples reputations from unfair attack. Defamation has always acted as a limit on both the freedom of speech as well as the freedom of the press. England and wales, the european court of human rights, south africa, australia, and the usa. More speech and more writing is the answer to the problem rather than defamation law, which discourages speech and writing and suppresses even information that probably wouldnt be found defamatory if it went to court. Questions have been raised on whether defamation should be treated as a civil wrong or criminal offence or both.
Defamation and freedom of speech argues that fundamental rules and procedures of defamation law need to be reformed to take into account the dual importance of public interest speech, on the one hand, and the right to human dignity on the other. This discussion flows from a theoretical analysis of the. Freedom of expression, law of defamation, constitution,human right. The first response to an accusation of defamation or hate speech may well be. In practice its main effect is to hinder free speech and protect powerful people from scrutiny. Following the introduction of the defamation act 2005, defamation law is now substantially uniform. Pdf defamation, privacy and freedom of press in kenya. The law of defamation contemplates the clash of two fundamental rights.
Choice of law for defamation, privacy rights and freedom of speech. This book argues that fundamental rules of defamation law need to be reformed to take into account the dual importance of public interest speech on the one hand, and the right to human dignity on the other. Freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right just like right to reputation and both should be balanced in context of defamation. The former refers to a defamatory statement that is published, whether in written. Chapter 3 cyber defamation, anonymity and hate speech. To achieve the desired object as stated earlier examination of constitutionality of law of defamation in that particular context is a kind of ringing bell demanding for the same or not.
Although everyone in south africa has the right to freedom of expression in terms of section 16 of our constitution 2, this right can be and is limited. The limitation on freedom of expression is whether it includes defamation and some kind of right to defame or not. Feb 14, 2008 the argument from democracy emphasizes that speech on matters of public interest should receive greater protection than private speech. To that end, we have been fighting for the religious liberty rights of all americans whether in the. In considering the remarks, justice willis had regard to the common law rights to privacy and to freedom of expression which are enshrined in our constitution but stated that the founders of our constitution could not. If a false criminal suit is lodged for defamation by the appellant, the respondent can file a counter claim. There are many challenges to freedom of speech in australia beyond 18c, for example defamation law. Defining defamation article 19 defending freedom of. Request pdf the freedom of speech and defamation the judgment of the court of appeal in what appears to be the latest in a series of significant decisions concerning the former opposition. While some continue to insist that this freedom is a breath of fresh air, others argue. For some politicians and commentators, 18c is the greatest challenge to freedom of speech in australia and the reform or repeal of this section will reinstate freedom of speech. Defamation is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be accurate, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion or nation a negative or inferior image. It prevents the dialogue and debate necessary to seek the truth. Religion in the public schools antidefamation league.
Freedom of speech and the law of defamation stupel and. Developments in the common law world adrienne stone and george williams this comment traces the relationship between freedom of speech and the com mon law of defamation in india, australia, south africa, canada, the united kingdom and new zealand. However, the supreme court of india supreme court has as recently as in 2016, upheld criminal defamation and its constitutional validity. Social media and defamation law pose threats to free. Free speech and civil defamation gautam bhatia examines the strict and unrealistic demands of defamation law, and concludes that defamation suits are a weapon to silence dissent and bad press. Exceptions to the first amendment congressional research service 1 introduction the first amendment to the united states constitution provides that congress shall make no law.
Nov 12, 2019 defamation is the communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of another. Strategies for people to challenge oppressive uses of defamation law need to be developed. Previously on this blog, we have discussed one of the underanalysed aspects of article 192 contempt of court. The main idea behind balancing should be exercise of individuals freedom of speech and expression without compromising with the persons reputation in the eyes of public. Replacing criminal sanction with the civil one cannot fulfil the criteria to balance the right of freedom of expression with the right to reputation. Examines the highly topical and controversial issue of balancing freedom of speech and the media with the right to reputation. In particular, the presumptions that defamatory allegations are false and have caused damage, the. A central theme is the treatment of the iconic deci.
Hustler magazine opened up the floodgates for defamation of public figures through a quite humorous case. The tension between free expression and defamation laws. Freedom of expression vs defamation and hate speech. After discovering his scandalous portrayal in the magazine, reverend jerry falwell sued hustler. Defamation law doesnt work well to protect reputations. It can be said that it incorporates the right to hold and express.
It is argued that criminalizing defamation has a harsh effect on the right to freedom of speech and expression provided under article 19. Ardia abstract it has long been a fixture of angloamerican law that defamation plaintiffs are not entitled to injunctive relief. Defamation law applies to all speech, whereas 18c applies only to speech. But the boundaries between freedom to criticise and damaging a persons honour or reputation are not always very clear. Faculty speech 122 academic freedom 127 defamation libel and slander 5 constitutional limits on defamation claims 140 categories of people 141 categories of statements 143 online speech. Defamation in india ipc section 499500 vs freedom of speech. Recent discussion about freedom of speech in australia has focused almost exclusively on section 18c of the racial discrimination act. Dario milo this text examines the law of defamation, and argues that it must be reformed in a. Whether a harmful speech comes under the offence of defamation or a fundamental right to free speech is a controversy till now the judges often make confusion whenever they decide on this dispute. Both the nigerian constitution and the international instruments, which have guaranteed the right to freedom of expression, have also provided for those circumstances where this right may be restricted or derogated from.
The rules of defamation law are designed to mediate between these two rights. Limits on freedom of expression library of congress. Discusses and compares the law in five jurisdictions in detail. Nov 20, 2015 in this matter, the south gauteng high court was called upon to determine a claim of defamation arising out of this comment. This language restricts governments ability to constrain the speech of citizens. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Freedom of speech defamation constitutional law reporter. Facebook, freedom of speech, defamation, and cyberbullying. Criminal offences relating to hate speech and sentencing freedom of expression and the media the role of public bodies in hate speech cases. Defamation and freedom of speech dario milo oxford. For many, criminalizing defamation is an unwarranted restriction on free speech when the global norm is that a civil suit for damages is sufficient for protecting reputation.
Choice of law for defamation, privacy rights and freedom of. Defamation is the communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of another. Freedom of expression is no longer to be regarded as a residual personal right, but is interpreted as a positive right reinforced by the public interest. Pdf on jan 1, 1998, filimon peonidis and others published freedom of expression, autonomy, and defamation find, read and cite all the. Protecting reputation without infringing free expression september 11, 2012 this paper examines the relationship in the online context between the right to free expression and defamation law. Freedom of information is a fundamental human right and the touchstone of all of the freedoms to which the united nations is consecrated. The central proposition that this book makes is that defamation law needs to be reformed to balance the conflicting rights. Nigeria, from 1618 march 1999, and the declaration regarding principles on freedom of expression and defamation, adopted by participants at the international colloquium on freedom of expression and defamation law, 1517 september 1999, colombo, sri lanka.
The conflict between defamation and privacy rights on the one hand and freedom of speech on the other in international litigation is very controversial in the eu. Social media and defamation law pose threats to free speech. Press freedom under attack around the world in 2018. It prevents the government and individuals from preventing a person from receiving. The first amendment in the internet age 145 from law books and theories to practice. Indian constitution historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure. This statement was approved and voted by the executive committee of the general conference of seventhday adventists on june 23, 2010, and released at the general conference session in atlanta, georgia, june 24july 3, 2010. The provisions of the defamation act 2005 are identified and explained and important topics such as reputation and freedom of speech are explored. The legal basis for freedom of expression in england, scotland and wales limitations on freedom of expression in different contexts including those relating to hate speech criminal offences relating to hate speech and sentencing freedom of expression and the media the role of public bodies in hate speech cases. Rights to reputation, free speech and freedom of religion at common law and under human rights laws. It explains how overly protective defamation laws can have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and public debate, and discusses the proportionality of. There is no such thing as a false opinion or idea however, there can be a false fact, and. Criminal defamation is in news recently for multiple reasons.